Tell JCAHO what you think about plans to expand primary source verification
Medical Staff Leader Connection, August 5, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
The JCAHO is seeking comment from healthcare organizations on a proposed change to its standards that would require primary-source verification for all practitioners required to have a license to practice.
The JCAHO has put out for "field review" a proposed change to standard HR.1.20 that would require verification of licensure, certification, or registration from primary sources, not only for all licensed independent practitioners as the accreditor now requires, but for advance practice nurses, physicians assistants and other staff who must have a license to practice. HR. 1.20 is found in the Human Resources chapter of the Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals. Comments are due by Friday, August 20.
The JCAHO noted the growing number of practitioners now licensed in order to practice. "Because of the ease of producing fraudulent credentials, the procedure of merely viewing the license or receiving a copy of the individual's license simply do not provide adequate protection against the against the use of fraudulent credentials," JCAHO president Dennis O'Leary, MD, wrote in a letter to organizations. Along with hospitals, the change would also apply to ambulatory care, behavioral health care, home care, crucial access hospitals, long-term care, and assisted living facilities.
Go to the JCAHO's Web site to view the proposed standard changes or complete an online comment form.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
