Don't take the bait
Medical Staff Leader Connection, April 22, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Dear Medical Staff Leader:
Overreacting to a letter of complaint from a member of your medical staff may simply exacerbate a situation. Consider the following: A frustrated medical staff member writes a long letter to the chief of staff demanding that the medical staff bylaws be amended to eliminate the malpractice insurance requirement. The letter explains the increasing unfairness of the malpractice situation for hard-working physicians and the collusion between the medical executive committee (MEC) and the board of directors, "which must be illegal and immoral siding with the enemy."
The author contends that the requirement is illegal, and many hospitals have eliminated these requirements to retain good physicians on their medical staffs. The physician also asserts that he or she has discussed the issue with an attorney, and threatens to take legal action if the bylaws are not amended.
A chief of staff may seek counsel from the hospital's attorney or chief executive officer as he or she drafts a response to this letter. In the response, he or she may attempt to explain to the irate physician that most hospitals require medical malpractice insurance, and the legal system has found that such requirements are not unfair restraints of trade. The response might also state that both the MEC and he or she would be glad to sit down with the physician to rationally discuss the issue.
Unfortunately, such a response often solicits yet another long response from the angry physician. Consider an alternative response. Send the physician your organization's bylaws amendment procedure, and invite him or her to "knock him- or herself out."
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Hugh Greeley
http://www.greeley.com/seminars/
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
