CMS issues final regulations addressing physician referrals
Medical Staff Leader Connection, March 31, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
CMS issued the second phase of its final regulations addressing physician referrals to entities with which they have financial relationships, known as Stark II, Phase II in the
The Stark Law, known as the physician self-referral law, prohibits physicians from referring Medicare and Medicaid patients for certain designated health services to entities with which the physician (or a member of the physician's immediate family) has a financial relationship, unless an exception applies.
The law also bans an entity from billing for services provided as a result of a prohibited referral.
Phase II responds to comments CMS received on the first phase of the regulations. It also includes the remaining statutory exceptions not covered in Phase I and creates new regulatory exceptions for nonabusive financial relationships.
Phase II contains 16 such exceptions, which are intended to outline financial regulations that do not pose fraud or abuse risks. They include provisions for services furnished under certain payment rates, professional courtesy, charitable donations, and anti-kickback safe harbors. CMS will accept comments for 90 days, and the final rule will go into effect in 120 days.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
