The importance of leadership selection criteria
Medical Staff Leader Connection, March 10, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Dear Medical Staff Leader:
The use of leadership selection criteria by the medical executive committee (MEC), medical staff nominating committee (which could be a subcommittee of the MEC), and the general medical staff is an important element in attracting the most qualified candidates for medical staff leadership positions. Selection criteria also sends a powerful message to all general staff members that leadership positions are vitally important to the success of your medical staff, and that current leaders encourage medical staff members to consider the attributes, skills, commitment, and demonstrated leadership capability of the physicians they are nominating.
The MEC should consider gathering input from senior administrative officers and board officers regarding the most important attributes the medical staff should consider when nominating and selecting future medical staff leaders. This is an excellent opportunity for medical staff officers to collaborate with senior administrative officers and board officers in developing leadership criteria that encourages the selection of leaders who will be able to work most positively with, and influence decisions of senior management and the board from a medical staff prospective. Medical staffs that elect physician leaders who can communicate and work well with senior administrative and board leaders will ultimately have far greater influence in directing organization-wide decisions that directly affect patient care and physician practices.
Leadership selection criterion also sends an important message to prospective physician leaders. A physician can review and use the selection criteria as a barometer concerning their own interest, ability, and skills. The criteria let them know that the position is extremely important to the effective functioning of the medical staff and the hospital. This will give importance to the position, and attract physicians interested in leading the staff and also focus their thinking on what's important to the medical staff and the organization (i.e. experience, commitment, continuity of leadership, and the ability to influence organization-wide leadership issues).
That's all for this week.
All the best,
Richard Sheff, MD
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
