Tip of the week: Select indicators that are useful for measuring physician performance
Medical Staff Leader Connection, October 13, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Years ago, the only choice medical staffs and hospitals had when selecting performance measures was to create their own indicators. Today, many national indicators are available to hospitals, including measurements required by TJC and CMS. However, even with the availability of these national measures, not all of them are useful for measuring physician competency and addressing the six general competencies. The following seven criteria will help guide your selection and prioritization of indicators for your medical staff: -- Relevancy: Is it relevant to physician performance? -- Competency: Does it relate to an important expectation? -- Type: What type of indicator (i.e. review, rule, or rate) would be most appropriate? -- Data source: Should the data come from clinical documentation, incident reports, or perception surveys? -- Attribution: Can it measure individual physician performance with reasonable reliability and accuracy, or is it effective only when measuring the performance of the medical staff or specialty as a group? -- Availability: How readily can the data be accessed? -- Benefit: Is the cost of the measure worth the improvement benefit?
This week’s tip is from Measuring Physician Competency.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
