News and briefs: Texas Medical Board will not respond to anonymous complaints
Medical Staff Leader Connection, September 29, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Patients and colleagues that want to file anonymous complaints against a physician don’t have the ability to do so under a new state law in Texas. According to an article in The Statesman, the Texas Medical Board is no longer reviewing and acting on anonymous complaints, an action that has some worried about fear of retaliation. Such was the case a few years back, when two nurses in Texas filed an anonymous complaint against a doctor (before the law went into effect), and were then fired and brought up on criminal charges when the doctor learned their identity.
However, the physicians who lobbied to pass the bill said it is necessary to stop abuse of the system and will prohibit doctors from filing false complaints against competitors. In 2007, the medical board was sued because of allegations its president was filing anonymous complaints against physicians who competed with his wife’s clinical practice. Anonymous complaints accounted for about 4% of all complaints annually. Although complainants must now identify themselves in written complaints to the board, this information is to remain confidential among board members.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
-
The Medical Executive Committee Handbook, Third Edition
Updated to reflect the new 2007 Joint Commission standards, this best-selling resource offers practical tools and strategies...
-
Effective Peer Review, Second Edition:
Newly updated and in high demand, Effective Peer Review, Second Edition, outlines and provides advice about how to do...
-
Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide, Sixth Edition
Written by experienced medical staff leaders currently working in hospitals, The Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide...
-
The Final Verdict on MS.01.01.01:
The Joint Commission has finalized and communicated the changes to MS.01.01.01. This program will not restate what you...
-
Medical Staff Briefing
This monthly resource acts as a support system by providing time-saving tools, expert advice, and analyses to help you...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched