Board oversight of credentialing and quality
Medical Staff Leader Insider, August 11, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Insider!
How does a hospital’s board oversee the medical staff’s credentialing and quality processes? It’s difficult, especially because many board members are community leaders, such as bankers, lawyers, businessmen, religious leaders, and do not have medical backgrounds. Yes, they rely on the medical staff to bring them pertinent information that assists them in making good decisions, but the board also provides oversight by ensuring that the medical staff operates within its policies and procedures.
Although federal and state laws and regulatory agencies state the board is ultimately responsible within the hospital, the board delegates hospital affairs to administration and the monitoring of practitioner quality to the medical staff. The medical staff performs this function by conducting appropriate credentialing and privileging and peer review. This all occurs within the purview of the bylaws and rules and regulations approved by the medical staff and the board, which the board expects to be comprehensive and compliant with all regulatory requirements.
To ensure that the bylaws, policies, and procedures are compliant, some boards regularly review significant process. The board may conduct an annual internal audit of credentialing and peer review to ensure that the medical staff is following the approved processes for these functions. Audits give the board reassurance that the credentialing, privileging, and peer review decisions being made are sound.
On a less frequent basis (every 3-5 years), the board may consider requesting that an external expert in the field assesses significant medical staff processes. These audits should answer the following three questions:
- Are the processes within regulatory compliance?
- Is the medical staff following approved processes?
- Are there any best practices in the field that the medical staff should consider adopting?
This allows the medical staff and board to keep abreast of useful information and tools that they can consider incorporating into their existing processes.
Mary J. Hoppa, MD, MBA, CMSL, is a senior consultant with The Greeley Company, a division of HCPro, Inc. in Danvers, MA.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Insider!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Note from Hugh
- Steps to comply with HIPAA 2.0: Revise your policies and procedures
- Q/A: How should we report irradiated blood products?
- 2014 SNF Proposed Rule Analysis: Revising and rebasing the SNF market basket
- Reminder: MDS correction policy to be updated effective May 19
- Ask the expert: BIMS assessment
- CMS issues transmittal to update the Medicare Provider Reimbursement Manual
- Steps to comply with HIPAA 2.0: Revise your policies and procedures
- Citing HIPAA, CVS to end prescription reminders via mail
- Residents say cause of death reporting often inaccurate
- E-mailed
-
- Change your EMR to prepare for ICD-10
- Georgia hospitals scrambling to create residency positions
- HCA initiative boosts flu shots among hospital workers
- CMS looking for comments on molecular pathology payments
- Citing HIPAA, CVS to end prescription reminders via mail
- Don't burn those ICD-9-CM Manuals just yet
- Managing the precertification process
- Solidify processes to avoid HAC penalties
- Tip: Keep an eye on evolving molecular pathology codes
- Creative Ways to Trim Nurse Staffing Costs
- Searched
