Tip of the week: Critical responsibilities for effective oversight of the peer review process
Medical Staff Leader Insider, July 28, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Insider!
The oversight function of the peer review process involves all the actions necessary to oversee the process to ensure that it is done correctly.
The oversight function is not always familiar to physicians because in many hospitals, the peer review process is not organized to perform it. Medical staff oversight of the peer review process may simply be an afterthought—they may do only what the quality staff tell them to do with regard to measurement, evaluation of data, and so forth, or they may resolve only controversial cases. To create an evaluation process that truly focuses on physician improvement, however, the medical staff must establish an active oversight structure with clearly assigned responsibilities that support the goals of peer review. Such an oversight structure will, for example, select relevant physician measures for all six performance dimensions and prioritize resource use.
Medical staff responsibilities critical to effective oversight of the peer review process include:
- Standardizing and coordinating the case review process to ensure reliability
- Ensuring consistent interpretation of physician performance data
- Selecting relevant physician measures for all performance dimensions or general competencies
- Ensuring that data is systematically collected and analyzed
- Ensuring that identified performance improvement opportunities are addressed
- Ensuring availability of physician performance data for feedback and reappointment
- Prioritizing the use of resources for measuring physician performance
This week’s tip is from Effective Peer Review, Second Edition: A Practical Guide to Contemporary Design by Robert Marder, MD, CMSL, MD, CMSL.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Insider!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Note from Hugh
- Note from the instructor: OIG report on usage of financial liability "G" modifiers
- CMS releases new QAPI resources
- HIPAA Q&A: Receiving faxed HEDIS requests
- Q/A: How do we report therapy G codes and modifiers for multiple therapies?
- Remind your workforce members to ’zip their lips’ when it comes to patient privacy
- CMS says it's not too late to avoid payment adjustments
- Documentation of medical necessity drives successful RA appeals
- FDA makes new proposal related to C. diff and other threatening pathogens
- E-mailed
-
- Note from the instructor: OIG report on usage of financial liability "G" modifiers
- Q/A: How do we report therapy G codes and modifiers for multiple therapies?
- HIPAA Q&A: Receiving faxed HEDIS requests
- CMS says it's not too late to avoid payment adjustments
- FDA makes new proposal related to C. diff and other threatening pathogens
- Eyes see more ICD-10-CM codes because of laterality
- Product of the week: Optimizing PEPPER in the Audit Environment
- Dangers of reporting costs improperly
- CMS releases new QAPI resources
- CMS releases new ICD-10 FAQs
- Searched
