Tip of the week: Determine what happens after hospitalist candidates are identified
Hospitalist Leadership Connection, July 27, 2011
The following is a step-by-step guide for lining up interviews with hospitalist candidates.
- Decide how quickly your program will review CVs and determine how to initiate contact with
- desirable candidates (No more than 48 hours recommended standard)
- Assign an individual to review incoming CVs, such as the program director or designee, practice administrator, or another person
- Decide which individual will make the initial contact with the candidate, and assess whether
- more than one individual will participate at this stage
- Determine how the initial contact with the candidate will be made—phone call (strongly recommended or e-mail
- After the initial contact, decide whether to pursue the candidate and define how this decision will be made and determine which individual will have the final say
- Hospitalist program director or designee and/or practice administrator usually make the decision
- Determine the method by which desirable candidates will be notified of the program’s interest and invited for an on-site interview and whether it will be at the time of initial contact, afterward, via telephone call (recommended), e-mail or letter (less personal and not recommended in most circumstances)
- Decide whether and how candidates who are not chosen for interviews will be notified and inform candidate he or she is not being pursued as a candidate (recommended)
- Discuss whether an information packet or e-mail will be sent to desirable candidates after the initial contact
- Send an “interview invitation” with pertinent information (strongly recommended) and consider sending an additional information packet to desirable candidates or a video or DVD describing the hospitalist program, the hospital, and other important information
This week's tip is from Tools and Strategies for an Effective Hospitalist Program.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
