The dos and don'ts of creating a code of conduct policy
Medical Staff Leader Connection, March 31, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
The way your medical staff goes about developing and enforcing a code of conduct policy can affect the policy’s effectiveness. Consider the following dos and don’ts when developing a policy at your institution:
Do:
- Distribute a draft of the medical staff’s behavior expectations before the document is finalized
- Ensure a long lead time for discussing draft expectations before the medical staff votes on them
- Encourage constructive criticism and input on the draft expectations from every physician
- Assign an individual to speak directly and privately with each formal and informal opinion leader
- Incorporate changes to the draft expectations that are recommended by physicians who weren’t involved in developing the initial draft
- Communicate openly about the process of developing the expectations policy at every step
- If only a few physicians are angry about the expectations policy after the medical staff has sought their input, develop strategies to reach out to those few physicians
Don’t:
- Bring a set of expectations of behavior policy to a vote without extensive discussion with physicians beforehand
- Count on the board to draft and adopt a physician behavior policy without lots of physician input and dialogue in advance
- Ignore physicians who are angry or unhappy about the expectations and behavior policy thinking they will just go away
- Try to get expectations or a behavior policy adopted in a hurry; doing so will truncate thorough discussion and lead physicians to feel disenfranchised.
This excerpt is from A Practical Guide to Managing Disruptive and Impaired Physicians, Second Edition, by R. Dean White, DDS, MS, and Jonathan H. Burroughs, MD, MBA, FACPE, CMSL.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
