Tip of the week: Develop policies to prevent physicians from treating themselves and family members
Medical Staff Leader Connection, March 17, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
According to the American Medical Association (AMA) Code of Medical Ethics (Opinion 8.19), physicians should not diagnose, treat, or prescribe medications for themselves or family members unless in an emergency situation or an isolated location where no other physician is available.
According to the AMA ethics policy, when physicians treat themselves or their family members, it can raise a number of issues, including:
- Physicians may not be objective when diagnosing and treating themselves or a patient who is also a family member
- Physicians may fail to ask personal questions or perform certain exams because they are uncomfortable
- Patients, particularly minor children, may feel uncomfortable providing certain personal information
- Physicians may be tempted to treat problems that are beyond their scopes of practice
- Patients who are family members may hesitate to speak up regarding their discomfort or may feel guilty about declining the physician’s recommendations
- The physician’s relationship with the family member may be compromised if there is a negative medical outcome
Given some physicians’ tendencies to gloss over the AMA or state guidelines, it is important for medical staffs to develop their own policies regarding self treatment and the treatment of family members. Negligent credentialing lawsuits are complicated enough, but if the plaintiff is a family member of the treating physician, the waters get murky.
This week’s tip comes from “Policies prohibiting self treatment protect medical staffs, physicians, and families” in the April issue of Credentialing & Peer Review Legal Insider.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
