Tip of the week: Use guidelines to help you develop criteria for new privileges
Medical Staff Leader Connection, December 30, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Due to changing healthcare technologies, increasing specialization, and the growth of individual healthcare institutions, organizations must routinely evaluate new procedures to establish criteria for privileging practitioners in that area. It is often difficult to determine whether a privilege belongs in the basic core or whether the criteria for a particular privilege should include additional education, training, or recent experience.
You can ask yourself the following questions to get a good idea of whether a privilege might be core or noncore:
- Knowledge: Is this procedure based on additional education or training that takes place within a postgraduate training program or via hands-on continuing medical education?
- Skill: Does the procedure require a higher level of skill, or does the procedure require regular practice to maintain proficiency?
- Judgment: Does the procedure require an especially high level of judgment?
- Risk: Are there significant risks associated with the procedure?
- Complications: Would the practitioner require additional, specific training, skills, and/or techniques to manage any potential complications?
- Techniques: Are new or controversial clinical techniques used?
- Equipment: Does the procedure require recently introduced technology or equipment, or does the procedure require additional training, advanced clinical skills, and/or specialized judgment?
Typically, a practitioner with extensive clinical expertise in the specialty under consideration will answer these questions. If the answer to any of these questions is yes, the organization will usually classify the procedure as a special, noncore privilege.
This week’s tip is from Ready, Set, Credential!, Second Edition, by Nancy C. Lian, CPMSM, CPCS.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
