Tips for critical access hospitals struggling to comply with MS.08.01.01 and MS.08.01.03
Medical Staff Briefing, November 1, 2010
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Medical Staff Briefing.
According to the September issue of Joint Commission Perspectives, 27% of critical access hospitals (CAH) struggle to comply with MS.08.01.01 and MS.08.01.03, which pertain to peer review. Although 27% doesn’t seem like a high number, it’s safe to say that because of their limited resources, including an in sufficient number of physicians, most critical access hospitals don’t consider peer review easy.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Medical Staff Briefing.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
