Tip of the week: Measure the burden of ED call
Medical Staff Leader Connection, September 16, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
To establish fair market value for physician ED call services, determine what those services actually are. Use objective data and ask physicians which of their ED services may be weighed. Keep in mind that services include more than procedures performed; they may also include information about the patients. There is no ideal way to measure the burden of call across all involved specialties. However, your report should include the following:
- Number of unassigned patients for each month of the study
- Total number of relative value units (RVU) physicians delivered to unassigned patient cohort
- Number of RVUs each specialty delivered, sorted by physician, within each specialty
- Distribution of diagnosis related groups (DRG) assigned to unassigned patient cohort
- Distribution of ICD-9 codes assigned to unassigned patient cohort
- Overall length of stay for unassigned patient cohort
- Length of stay for the most common DRGs for unassigned patient cohort
- Distribution of payer status related to unassigned patient cohort
- Length of stay related to most common payer classes
- Length of stay by physician within most common DRGs
- Estimated reimbursement per RVU for physician services related to each payer class
- A pro forma reflecting the cost of an ED back up panel-type program to the hospital using various payment rates per RVU to physicians
This week’s tip is from Emergency Department On-Call Strategies, Second Edition, by Jonathan H. Burroughs, MD, MBA, FACPE, CMSL; Martin B. Buser, MPH, FACHE; Roger A. Heroux, MHA, PhD, FACHE; and Richard A. Sheff, MD, CMSL.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
