Tip of the week: Reduce bias in peer review by understanding where it stems from
Medical Staff Leader Insider, August 5, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Insider!
Medical staffs know that the peer review process is not free of bias, but what they might not know is that bias goes far beyond being a partner or competitor to the physician being reviewed. There are many sources of bias, including:
- Fear of retribution from a colleague, either personally, professionally, or economically
- Fear that an adverse peer review judgment will have a negative effect on a colleague’s professional and personal life
- Anger toward a competitor or colleague for a perceived wrong that deserves retribution
- Desire to protect or shield a colleague, partner, employer, and/or employee from potential damage to his or her reputation or standing
- Desire to protect or shield a group of individuals (e.g., department, division, private enterprise) from potential damage to reputation or standing)
- Certainty regarding analysis despite subsequent evidence to the contrary
- Selective elimination of information that does not confirm an initial analysis or impression
- A tendency to base judgments on information that is readily available, most recent, or that contains
- Strong emotional content
- Inadvertently linking current circumstances to patterns or perceptions established in the past
- Maintaining an irrational commitment toward an issue, despite mounting evidence to the contrary
- Inappropriately ascribing a pattern to random events
- Inappropriately surmising a decision or action based on retrospective analysis
- Overestimating one’s ability to judge and analyze a situation correctly, despite evidence to the contrary
This week’s tip is adapted from Peer Review Best Practices: Case Studies and Lessons Learned by Robert J. Marder, MD, CMSL, and Jonathan H. Burroughs, MD, FACPE, CPE, FACEP, CMSL, published by HCPro.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Insider!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Note from the instructor: CMS clarifies payment amount to be applied to payment caps and manual review thresholds for outpatient therapy services provided by critical access hosptials
- Five tips for an effective hospital patient safety program
- Recent Recovery Auditor activity
- Note from Hugh
- The week in Medicare updates
- Overnight physicians in ICU show little effect on outcomes
- Latest scores show incremental progress in hospital safety
- Steps to comply with HIPAA 2.0: Revise your policies and procedures
- Q&A: Focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE)
- Maine comes in first in hospital safety
- E-mailed
-
- Note from the instructor: CMS clarifies payment amount to be applied to payment caps and manual review thresholds for outpatient therapy services provided by critical access hosptials
- Q&A: Focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE)
- Five tips for an effective hospital patient safety program
- Overnight physicians in ICU show little effect on outcomes
- CMS recommends use of AHRQ Common Formats for hospital adverse event reporting
- ACDIS/AHIMA brief provides guidance on query best practices
- Maine comes in first in hospital safety
- 2014 IPPS Proposed Rule: CMS focuses on quality measures, inpatient status
- Changes for Outpatient Laboratory Services Rendered in a Critical Access Hospital (CAH)
- ED physicians key to half of hospital admissions
- Searched
