Consultation codes hurt revenue, AMA study says
Hospitalist Leadership Connection, July 20, 2010
The majority of physicians have lost revenue due to Medicare’s elimination of consultation codes, according to recent survey by the American Medical Association (AMA).
Effective Jan. 1, 2010, CMS no longer reimburses for consultation code bills for Medicare and Medicaid. CMS issued the final rule, asserting that Medicare revenues wouldn’t significantly decline.
The AMA surveyed about 5,500 physician respondents in 17 specialties, collecting data taken in April. The study found:
- 83% of physician respondents said their total revenue stream decreased as a result of Medicare consultation code changes
- 30% modified their practices or services
- 20% reduced the number of new Medicare patients
- 12% reduced the amount of time spent with Medicare patients
- 10% reduced or eliminated consultations on hospital inpatients
- 39% said they will put off purchasing new equipment or information technology
- 34% said they will eliminate staff
Several physician organizations addressed the discontinuation of CPT consultation codes, advocating for CMS to review and revise the 2011 Medicare physician fee schedule rule, in a joint June 18 letter to CMS from organizations, including the American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, and the American Medical Group Association.
“A review of CMS’s current policies regarding physician consultations is clearly called
for,” states the letter. “Revenue losses for consultant physicians are larger than projected. Physicians have been forced to reduce services to Medicare patients and care coordination has suffered as a result of the policy.”
Have an opinion on CPT coding changes? Comment on the www.MedicalStaffLeader.com blog.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
