Tip of the week: Create a professional reference questionnaire policy
Medical Staff Leader Connection, June 17, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Although nearly all hospitals use professional reference questionnaires during the credentialing process, few have a policy that addresses appropriate use of the questionnaire. Such a policy should answer the following questions:
- How many references should be required?
- When do references need to be obtained (e.g., at initial appointment, at reappointment when there is insufficient clinical activity, when a practitioner requests new privileges)?
- Who is considered an appropriate reference source?
- When is follow-up required (e.g., outstanding queries, incomplete information, red flags)?
- Who will follow up with reference sources when they provide insufficient information?
- How long does a credentialing professional or credentials committee member have to follow up with reference sources, and when should the applicant be notified if the reference source has not responded?
- Under what circumstances should an application be deemed incomplete (e.g., if requested information is not received in a timely manner or at all)?
- How should MSPs obtain references for low- and no-volume providers?
Your medical staff should have a policy that places the burden on the applicant to prove his or her clinical competence and provide all the information the medical staff leaders, credentials committee, MEC, and governing body need to make evidence-based decisions regarding membership and privileges.
This week’s tip is excerpted from Assessing the Competency of Low-Volume Practitioners: Tools and Strategies for OPPE and FPPE Compliance by Mark A. Smith, MD, MBA, CMSL, and Sally Pelletier, CPMSM, CPCS.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
