Ask the expert: When measuring the burden of ED call, which patients should the hospital collect data on?
Medical Staff Leader Connection, June 10, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
To measure the burden of ED call on your medical staff, it is important to collect data on unassigned patients, but first you must define the term “unassigned ED patient.” It is a patient who, in the judgment of the attending emergency physician, requires on-site consultation, which may include admission, and does not have a private physician to arrange specialty care. The designation of unassigned status is independent of patient funding. For some specialties, such as general surgery, emergency patients are most all unassigned patients, unless specialists have a prior relationship with the patient.
When collecting data on unassigned patients, be sure to include all of the following:
- ED admission of unassigned patients
- ED non-admission of unassigned patients
- Trauma patients
- OB unassigned patients bypassing the ED
- Pediatric unassigned patients bypassing the ED
- Psychiatric unassigned patients bypassing the ED
- Transfer patients admitted to the specialist on call
This week’s question and answer are adapted from Emergency Department On-Call Strategies, Second Edition by Jonathan H. Burroughs, MD, MBA, FACPE, CMSL; Martin B. Buser, MPH, FACHE; Roger A. Heroux, MHA, PhD, FACHE; and Richard A. Sheff, MD, CMSL.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
-
The Medical Executive Committee Handbook, Third Edition
Updated to reflect the new 2007 Joint Commission standards, this best-selling resource offers practical tools and strategies...
-
Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide, Sixth Edition
Written by experienced medical staff leaders currently working in hospitals, The Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide...
-
Assessing the Competency of Low-Volume Practitioners:
The Joint Commission requires that hospitals verify physician competence using performance data. Yet organizations often...
-
The Final Verdict on MS.01.01.01:
The Joint Commission has finalized and communicated the changes to MS.01.01.01. This program will not restate what you...
-
Medical Staff Briefing
This monthly resource acts as a support system by providing time-saving tools, expert advice, and analyses to help you...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched