Tip of the week: Don't over-define terms in your medical staff bylaws
Medical Staff Leader Connection, May 13, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Most medical staff bylaws contain a section labeled “definitions” that precisely defines many of the terms used within. In reality, few physicians are interested in exploring the detailed definition of the word “appointee” for example. When considering adopting this section, bylaws committees should, at minimum, refrain from creating a long and immaterial list of definitions. Any word used in the bylaws document that has a commonly accepted definition need not be further defined. In addition, words that are defined within the bylaws, such as “special notice,” need not be defined again in this section. Commonly known organizations, such as the National Practitioner Data Bank, also do not need to be defined in this area.
The medical staff may wish to omit the definitions section, but hospital legal counsel may be uncomfortable doing so. If it must be included, consider designing the section so that it does not add to the bureaucratic feel of the document. Instead of placing it at the beginning of the document, consider including it at the end.
This week’s tip is adapted from The Greeley Guide to Medical Staff Bylaws, Second Edition, by Joseph D. Cooper, MD, CMSL.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
-
The Medical Executive Committee Handbook, Third Edition
Updated to reflect the new 2007 Joint Commission standards, this best-selling resource offers practical tools and strategies...
-
Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide, Sixth Edition
Written by experienced medical staff leaders currently working in hospitals, The Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide...
-
Assessing the Competency of Low-Volume Practitioners:
The Joint Commission requires that hospitals verify physician competence using performance data. Yet organizations often...
-
The Final Verdict on MS.01.01.01:
The Joint Commission has finalized and communicated the changes to MS.01.01.01. This program will not restate what you...
-
Medical Staff Briefing
This monthly resource acts as a support system by providing time-saving tools, expert advice, and analyses to help you...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched