Ask the expert: What happens if an applicant for reappointment fails to meet the minimum competency criteria for a privilege requested?
Medical Staff Leader Connection, March 18, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
It is possible that a practitioner simply has not completed enough of a certain procedure in the past two years to be eligible for continued privileges. To avoid denying a practitioner privileges (which must be reported to certain national agencies and will go into a practitioner’s permanent credentialing file), organizations should set procedures for helping the applicant re-qualify for the requested privileges. Usually, the department head and credentials committee will determine how many more procedures the applicant must complete prior to granting privileges to or reappointing the applicant. The practitioner must then complete these procedures under the supervision of a proctor—another physician with current privileges.
This week’s question and answer are from Ready, Set, Credential, Second Edition by Nancy C. Lian, CPMSM, CPCS.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
-
The Medical Executive Committee Handbook, Third Edition
Updated to reflect the new 2007 Joint Commission standards, this best-selling resource offers practical tools and strategies...
-
Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide, Sixth Edition
Written by experienced medical staff leaders currently working in hospitals, The Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide...
-
Assessing the Competency of Low-Volume Practitioners:
The Joint Commission requires that hospitals verify physician competence using performance data. Yet organizations often...
-
The Final Verdict on MS.01.01.01:
The Joint Commission has finalized and communicated the changes to MS.01.01.01. This program will not restate what you...
-
Medical Staff Briefing
This monthly resource acts as a support system by providing time-saving tools, expert advice, and analyses to help you...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched