Section 1921 changes unite NPDB and HIPDB: All licensed professionals now reportable
Medical Staff Briefing, April 1, 2010
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Medical Staff Briefing.
Since the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), issued changes to Section 1921 of the Social Security Act in January, the credentialing world has been in a flurry. The changes require state licensing agencies to report nonphysician and nondentist practitioners to National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) for any adverse licensure actions.
MSPs and medical staff leaders want to know how these changes affect medical staff functions. The good news is that the changes don’t affect medical staff functions much, says Mary Hoppa, MD, MBA, CMSL, senior consultant at The Greeley Company, a division of HCPro, Inc. in Marblehead, MA. "States, peer review organizations, and accreditation organizations have extra mandatory reporting requirements. It doesn't affect the medical staff in any way other than it increases the robustness of information coming out of the data bank."
However, just because these changes don’t directly affect the medical staff, it is still important for MSPs and medical staff leaders to understand the nuances of the changes, because these individuals may help facilitate hospital reporting and querying processes.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Medical Staff Briefing.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
