Ask the expert: Should the medical staff exclude employed physicians from hearings because of their financial relationship with the hospital?
Medical Staff Leader Connection, February 11, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
There is no reason that an employed physician cannot serve on a panel unless he or she has a conflict of interest with the affected practitioner, just like any other practitioner. A fair hearing is not an opportunity to pit the hospital against the medical staff; it is a medical staff function in which physicians are evaluating another physician’s performance as outlined in the medical staff bylaws. There need not be any prohibition against any physician, whether independent, contracted, or employed, as long as the other rules regarding economic competition and conflict of interest apply—and they apply to everyone.
This week’s question and answer are excerpted from “Fair hearings 101: Tips for selecting hearing panel members to ensure a fair and equitable process” in the February issue of Credentialing & Peer Review Legal Insider.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
-
The Medical Executive Committee Handbook, Third Edition
Updated to reflect the new 2007 Joint Commission standards, this best-selling resource offers practical tools and strategies...
-
Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide, Sixth Edition
Written by experienced medical staff leaders currently working in hospitals, The Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide...
-
The Final Verdict on MS.01.01.01:
The Joint Commission has finalized and communicated the changes to MS.01.01.01. This program will not restate what you...
-
The 15th Annual Credentialing Resource Center Symposium Seminar: Orlando, FL
The premiere event for credentialing and medical staff services professionals offers workable solutions for tough issues
-
Medical Staff Briefing
This monthly resource acts as a support system by providing time-saving tools, expert advice, and analyses to help you...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched