Tip of the week: Train physician reviewers to do effective case reviews
Medical Staff Leader Connection, November 4, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Physicians have reviewed case charts from their first days of medical school, but they are rarely taught to do so formally. What should they be looking for when they are handed a folder filled with a patient’s medical records? To help physicians answer this question, it is best practice for a medical staff to create a training program to improve the inter-rater reliability of new committee members and keep current members on track.
There are three components to reviewer training. First, reviewers must have a common understanding of the procedures and tools. This is best achieved through an orientation session. During this session, the trainer needs to explain the case review process and define the expectations of reviewers in terms of review time frames and scoring form completion.
Second, the reviewers should have some practical guidance during the review. Provide a well designed review form and some questions for the reviewer to keep in mind.
Third, the reviewers need a method to calibrate their performance to the group norm. This can be accomplished by having reviewers score the same case independently and discuss the results. Medical staffs can do this when a new committee is started, when new members join the committee, and annually with the entire committee.
This week’s tip is excerpted from Peer Review Best Practices: Case Studies and Lessons Learned by Robert J. Marder, MD, CMSL and Jonathan H. Burroughs, MD, FACPE, CPE, FACEP, CMSL.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Hospice group to pay U.S. $1.83 million in False Claims Act suit
- Q/A: Billing for DME
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Providers report first RAC denials in Florida, South Carolina
- Searched
