Ask the expert: As a medical staff leader, are there any decision-making techniques I should be using during meetings?
Medical Staff Leader Connection, October 14, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Meetings almost always include action items that call for group decision-making. Some action items require creativity and brainstorming, while others require more forceful negotiation and trade-offs.
Effective group leaders must be clear about the type of decision needed for each action item. Following are three decision-making techniques you can use:
- Consensus: Consensus requires unanimous agreement, which is often difficult to attain. Groups and committees usually require consensus only when deciding straight-forward, non-confrontational issues. Reaching consensus often requires all participants to compromise.
- Majority rule: Majority rule is best used when legitimate, informed differences of opinion exist, or when committees need to choose between two or more valid options. Close the issue after voting—don’t allow it to be revisited simply because some participants are unhappy with the outcome.
- Minority rule: With minority rule decisions, leaders are forced to assert their authority. This decision-making process should be used sparingly, usually in crisis situations. When making minority-rule decisions, leaders should inform and request cooperation from all group members. Explain the thinking that lead to an otherwise unpopular decision, and allow meeting participants to voice disapproval or provide input as long as it is constructive to do so.
This week’s question and answer are adapted from The Medical Executive Committee Handbook, Third Edition, by Mary Hoppa, MD, MBA, CMSL; Albert Fritz, MHA; and Richard Sheff, MD, CMSL.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations, December 2009
- Hand hygiene rates improved through variety of reinforcement styles
- Press Ganey report: Patient satisfaction increasing across the country
- Residency Program Alert, December 2009
- Searched
