Lessons learned: VA quality concerns trigger hospitals to polish peer review practices
Medical Staff Briefing, October 1, 2009
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Medical Staff Briefing.
Additionally, investigations revealed that the brachytherapy program at the Philadelphia VA lacked a thorough and consistent peer review process.
The brachytherapy program was repeatedly green lighted by The Joint Commission and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. It is not specifically known why those organization’s didn’t uncover more problems, highlighting the need for hospitals to carefully monitor each program’s and each physician’s performance.
Below are some tips to help your organization polish its peer review processes and ensure system inefficiencies or physician competency issues don’t escalate to the point at which harm caused to patients receives national attention.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Medical Staff Briefing.
Related Products
-
The Medical Executive Committee Handbook, Third Edition
Updated to reflect the new 2007 Joint Commission standards, this best-selling resource offers practical tools and strategies...
-
Effective Peer Review, Second Edition:
Newly updated and in high demand, Effective Peer Review, Second Edition, outlines and provides advice about how to do...
-
Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide, Sixth Edition
Written by experienced medical staff leaders currently working in hospitals, The Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide...
-
The Greeley Guide to Medical Staff Bylaws, Second Edition
The Greeley Company Guide to Medical Staff Bylaws, Second Edition, is an easy-to-use tool that empowers you with the...
-
Medical Staff Briefing
This monthly resource acts as a support system by providing time-saving tools, expert advice, and analyses to help you...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Hospice group to pay U.S. $1.83 million in False Claims Act suit
- Q/A: Billing for DME
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Providers report first RAC denials in Florida, South Carolina
- Searched