Ask the expert: CMS had changed its definition of "physician" to include MDs, DOs, DPMs, optometrists, and chiropractors. Does that mean we are required to include these practitioners on the medical staff?
Medical Staff Leader Connection, July 8, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
No, unless otherwise required by state law, says Claude (Bud) Pate, REHS, vice president of content and development at The Greeley Company, a division of HCPro, Inc. in Marblehead, MA. “For example, in California DPMs are members of the medical staff; but that’s California. CMS rules do not govern this issue.”
Also, remember the difference between medical staff membership and privileges, says William Cors, MD, MMM, CMSL, vice president of the medical staff services division at The Greeley Company. “I just did a project with a hospital during which we limited membership to MDs, DOs, and DMDs. Then we wrote a separate board policy as to whom may have privileges without membership. This policy includes DPMs and traditional advanced practice professionals, including advanced practice registered nurses and physician assistants, as well as MD/DOs providing telemedicine services. You do not have to offer membership or privileges to anyone, and in this case the board chose not to list chiropractors or optometrists. Note it has to be a board-driven decision and policy to avoid anti-competitive grounds for lawsuits.”
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
-
The Medical Executive Committee Handbook, Third Edition
Updated to reflect the new 2007 Joint Commission standards, this best-selling resource offers practical tools and strategies...
-
Manage Aging and Potentially Impaired Physicians:
As the wave of Baby Boomers peaks, an increasing number of physicians are approaching retirement age. Although not all aging...
-
The Final Verdict on MS.01.01.01:
The Joint Commission has finalized and communicated the changes to MS.01.01.01. This program will not restate what you...
-
The 15th Annual Credentialing Resource Center Symposium Seminar: Orlando, FL
The premiere event for credentialing and medical staff services professionals offers workable solutions for tough issues
-
Medical Staff Briefing
This monthly resource acts as a support system by providing time-saving tools, expert advice, and analyses to help you...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched