Tip of the week: Protect your facility from apparent agency claims with these best practices
Medical Staff Leader Connection, July 8, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Under the apparent agency theory, a patient can sue a hospital for the negligence of a physician if the patient perceived that the physician was an employee or agent of the hospital at the time the care was rendered. Hospitals commonly contract with medical groups to provide certain services, so hospitals in states that subscribe to the apparent agency theory often use disclaimer forms to protect themselves from being included in a malpractice claim. If your hospital is in a state that upholds the apparent agency theory, use these best practices to clarify practitioners’ role with the organization:
- Ensure that the disclaimer form is written in plain, understandable language (multiple languages if necessary)
- Post signs throughout the facility explaining the practitioners’ relationship to the hospital and that patients will receive separate bills from the contracted medical group
- Require that contracted physicians wear name tags and uniforms distinct from those worn by licensed independent practitioners and employed practitioners who do not work under contract
- Require physicians to provide patients with a verbal disclosure summarizing what is stated on the form. Patients should then verbally acknowledge that they understand, and the physician should document the disclosure and acknowledgement in patients’ medical records
This week’s tip is adapted from “Are apparent agency disclaimers fair?” in the July issue of Credentialing and Peer Review Legal Insider.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Searched
