Lack of inpatient beds is major cause of ED crowding
Hospitalist Leadership Connection, June 9, 2009
Crowding in the emergency department (ED) is caused, in part, because of a lack of inpatient beds, according to a recent report by Government Accountability Office, “Hospital Emergency Departments: Crowding Continues to Occur, and Some Patients Wait Longer than Recommended Time Frames,” published in April 2009.
In 2006, 119 million Americans visited the ED. Based on 2006 data, researchers studied indicators of ED crowding, including ambulance diversion, patient wait times, and patient boarding.
Researchers found that the majority of patients with an “immediate” acuity level, i.e., patients who should have be seen immediately (under one minute), waited about half an hour (28 minutes). Half of the patients with an “emergent” acuity level who had a recommended wait time of 1–14 minutes waited double that amount of time (37 minutes), according to the report.
However, urgent or semi-urgent patients were seen at an acceptable wait time. “Urgent” patients, who should be seen within 15–60 minutes, waited an average of 50 minutes—right on time. Those who were considered “semiurgent,” who should be seen within one to two hours, only waited 68 minutes.
“In terms of factors that contribute to crowding, we reported that crowding is a complex issue, and no single factor tends to explain why crowding occurs,” states the study. “However, we found that one key factor contributing to crowding was the availability of inpatient beds for patients admitted to the hospital from the emergency department.”
[via HospitalistLeadership.com]
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Searched
