Update: Changing IOM resident work hours to cost billions more, study says
Hospitalist Leadership Connection, May 22, 2009
Despite initial reports that the cost of implementing suggested resident work hour changes from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) would be $1.6 billion, it could cost teaching hospitals billions more—$3.2 million annually—according to a new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).
The analysis stated that the IOM's estimated $1.6 billion is based on 2006 dollars. The actual cost could range between $1.6 billion and $2.5 billion by today’s currency, said study researchers at the RAND Corporation and University of California, Los Angeles.
Researchers considered the various solutions hospitals may implement to cover resident workload if the IOM’s recommendations become requirements, including adding more residents or shifting the work to other healthcare workers. They looked at published data to determine approximate costs of each model.
"Adopting new restrictions on the work hours of physicians in training would impose a substantial new cost on the nation's 8,500 physician training programs," said lead author Dr. Teryl K. Nuckols, an internist at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and a researcher at RAND, a nonprofit research organization in a press release. "There is no obvious way to pay for these changes so that's one major issue that must be addressed."
Because hospitals may choose any number of ways to cover residents’ workload, it was difficult for researchers to ascertain what the impact will be on patient safety.
[via Residency Program Connection]
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Searched
