In the news: California Supreme Court limits the role of the hearing officer
Medical Staff Leader Connection, May 13, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
A recent California Supreme Court ruling limits the role of the hearing officer after a non-physician fair hearing officer single handedly dismissed a doctor’s case for not cooperating with the fair hearing process in 2003.
According to the AMNews article, Dr. Gil N. Mileikowsky’s privileges at West Hills Hospital came into question when he failed to notify the medical staff that his privileges at two other hospitals had been terminated or suspended. The fair hearing officer requested documentation from Mileikowsky multiple times over the course of several months before dismissing the case without consulting with the hospital’s peer review committee.
The court ruled that the purpose of peer review is to secure an independent review by qualified persons. Justice Kathryn Mickle Werdegar wrote in the April 6 majority opinion, “That purpose is defeated if the matter is dismissed before the reviewing panel becomes involved. ... [The hearing officer] has no part in the decision-making process and no authority to prevent the reviewing panel from reviewing the recommendation.”
Here's some FREE bylaws language regarding hearing panel composition from The Greeley Company, a division of HCPro, Inc. in Marblehead, MA.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Related Products
-
The Medical Executive Committee Handbook, Third Edition
Updated to reflect the new 2007 Joint Commission standards, this best-selling resource offers practical tools and strategies...
-
Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide, Sixth Edition
Written by experienced medical staff leaders currently working in hospitals, The Medical Staff Leaders' Practical Guide...
-
Assessing the Competency of Low-Volume Practitioners:
The Joint Commission requires that hospitals verify physician competence using performance data. Yet organizations often...
-
The Top 40 Medical Staff Policies and Procedures, Fourth Edition:
It provides medical staff-specific policies in one resource – these can be implemented right away, and they spare the...
-
Medical Staff Briefing
This monthly resource acts as a support system by providing time-saving tools, expert advice, and analyses to help you...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Searched