IOM recommendations for resident hours may affect hospitalist programs
Medical Staff Briefing, April 1, 2009
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Medical Staff Briefing.
In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) said it would revisit resident duty hours after five years of experience. In addition, in 2007, the IOM charged the Committee on Optimizing Graduate Medical Trainee (Resident) Hours and Work Schedules to Improve Patient Safety to evaluate current work conditions for residents and develop suggestions for improvement. Teaser: Q: What are the Institute of Medicine?s (IOM) recommendations for resident duty hours? A: In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) said it would revisit resident duty hours after five years of experience. In addition, in 2007, the IOM charged the Committee on Optimizing Graduate Medical Trainee (Resident) Hours and Work Schedules to Improve Patient Safety to evaluate current work conditions for residents and develop suggestions for improvement. According to a brief of its December 2008 report, Resident Duty Hours: Enhancing Sleep, Supervision, and Safety, the IOM recommends that residents still work the current standard of 80 averaged hours per week. However, instead of 30 consecutive hours, the IOM recommends: ? Resident shifts should be no longer than 16 hours. For shifts up to 30 hours, residents should be allowed five hours of protected sleep time after the first 16 awake hours. ? Residency programs should provide residents with adequate time off outside of the hospital between shifts?based on the timing and duration of the shifts?to allow recuperation from sleep deprivation. ? Internal and external moonlighting should be counted against the 80-hour weekly limit. (Currently, the ACGME only counts internal moonlighting against the 80-hour limit.)
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Medical Staff Briefing.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Searched
