Tip of the week: Define "investigation" in your bylaws
Medical Staff Leader Connection, October 8, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
It is important to have a crystal-clear definition of “investigation” in your bylaws, because a failure to do so could have serious implications when reporting to the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB). The NPDB requires hospitals to report practitioners who voluntarily surrender membership or clinical privileges while under investigation for possible clinical incompetence or unprofessional conduct. The NPDB also requires hospitals to report physicians who surrender membership or clinical privileges in return for the hospital not conducting an investigation or taking a professional review action.
The NPDB requires a report even when the practitioner is unaware of the investigation. All practitioners who surrender membership or privileges while under investigation must be reported regardless of the practitioner’s stated reason (e.g., personal health concerns, retirement, relocation, and personal circumstances, such as divorce, etc.).
The NPDB guidebook states the following concerning investigations:
- An investigation should be carried out by the healthcare entity and not by an individual on the staff
- The hospital should create contemporaneous evidence of an ongoing investigation (e.g., meeting minutes, an order from a hospital leader initiating an investigation, letters to the practitioner involved, etc.)
- An investigation should address concerns about professional competence or conduct
- An investigation is considered ongoing until a final action is taken or it is formally closed
- An investigation should be a precursor to a professional review action
- A general or routine review of cases is not an investigation
- A general or routine review of a particular practitioner is not an investigation
This week's tip is from The Greeley Guide to Medical Staff Bylaws, Second Edition, by Joseph D. Cooper, MD.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Tip of the week: Define "investigation" in your bylaws ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Code changes should help ease the pain when coding for facet joint injections
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Searched
