HHS proposes ICD-10 code
Hospitalist Leadership Connection, August 19, 2008
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on Friday announced its proposal to implement an expanded, more complex coding system called ICD-10 to improve disease tracking and encourage nationwide electronic documentation. The ICD-10 code would replace the long-standing ICD-9-CM code used for reporting diagnosis and inpatient procedures. In a separate proposal, ICD-10 would require the adoption of an updated X12 standard, Version 5010 for healthcare transactions, and the National Council for Prescription Drug Programs standard, Version D.0 for electronic claims.
Now considered “outdated,” according to an HHS press release, the existing 30-year old ICD-9 has a limited 17,000 code sets—not enough to account for the growing number of diagnoses and inpatient procedures. By comparison, ICD-10 would include a possible 155,000 code sets.
What could this mean for inpatient medicine and hospitalists? With a target date of Oct. 1, 2011, the proposed ICD-10 would require a full transition during a three-year timeline, and Version 5010 and Version D.0 would be required by April 1, 2010. In addition, there are anticipated startup costs to implementing the coding change for administrations in both public and private healthcare facilities
“The greatly expanded ICD-10 code sets will enable HHS to fully support quality reporting, pay-for-performance, bio-surveillance, and other critical activities,” said HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt in a press release on Friday. “Conversion to ICD-10 is essential to development of a nationwide electronic health information environment, and the updated X12 transaction standards are a critical step in the implementation of these new codes.”
Comments
0 comments on “HHS proposes ICD-10 code ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
