What CMS IPPS final rule means for hospitalists
Hospitalist Leadership Connection, August 5, 2008
Last week, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued its inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) final rule that updates Medicare payments to hospitals. The CMS rule aims to improve inpatient care and to reduce the occurrence of “never events,” or medical errors, including hospital acquired conditions (HAC).
How will the new updates affect hospitalists? Hospitalists are uniquely positioned to perform overall system implementation through standardization, according to Eric Siegel, MD, regional medical director of Cogent Healthcare and Chair of the Society of Hospital Medicine Public Policy Committee. “The key to improving performance in a hospital is to reduce unnecessary variation in processes. If there’s one best way to do something, there shouldn’t be people doing it six different ways,” said Siegal, in an interview with HCPro, Inc. “Hospitalists can put systems in place to reduce that variation.”
The IPPS final rule is anticipated to affect more than 3,500 hospitals that currently receive payment under Medicare’s diagnosis related group (DRG) payment system.
Read more about the role hospitalists play in CMS rules in a pay-for-performance article in the upcoming September issue of Hospitalist Management Advisor.
Comments
0 comments on “What CMS IPPS final rule means for hospitalists ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
