Medical Staff Alert: Poliner decision overturned
Medical Staff Leader Connection, July 30, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Physicians who have been reluctant to participate in peer review activities can relax a bit knowing that the Health Care Quality Improvement Act (HCQIA) still stands on solid ground.
In 1998, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas suspended Dr. Lawrence Poliner’s cardiac catheterization and echocardiography privileges after several physicians questioned his technical competence during peer review activities. Poliner rebutted with a law suit. During the 2003 trial, Poliner convinced the jury that the suspension damaged his career and caused mental anguish. The jury subsequently awarded him $370 million in damages. A trial court later reduced that amount to approximately $33 million.
On July 23, 2008, The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit overturned the jury and the trial court’s decisions and found in favor of Texas Health System, concluding that the physicians who advocated for Poliner’s suspension are protected under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. As a result, Poliner will not receive any monetary award for damages.
Read more about the Poliner vs. Texas Health Systems case.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Medical Staff Alert: Poliner decision overturned ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
