Ask the expert: What does zero tolerance mean?
Medical Staff Leader Connection, July 23, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
When addressing disruptive physician behavior, organizations must understand an often confusing phrase: zero tolerance. Many medical staffs are adopting a zero-tolerance policy with regard to disruptive behavior, but some hospitals are confused about what exactly zero tolerance entails. This confusion is understandable because this phrase has been defined in two ways: strict and less strict.
The strict definition of zero tolerance implies that a single incident of disruptive behavior will lead to corrective action and the physician will automatically lose membership and privileges. The less strict definition of zero tolerance states that disruptive behavior is never justified, and the organization’s first step is to provide feedback to that physician and remind him or her of the expectations set forth in the behavior policy.
If your organization adopts a zero-tolerance policy regarding disruptive physician behavior, be sure to clarify how the term should be applied. This clarification is not only fair to your physicians, but it will likely improve compliance with the policy.
This week’s question and answer are adapted from A Practical Guide to Preventing and Solving Disruptive Physician Behavior by Richard A. Sheff, MD, CMSL and Todd Sagin, MD, JD.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Ask the expert: What does zero tolerance mean? ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
