Tip of the week: Don't be afraid to use external review when appropriate
Medical Staff Leader Connection, March 5, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Hospitals should have a policy that clearly describes the circumstances under which it would seek the assistance of an external peer review organization. Some examples of when hospitals should use external reviews include (but are not limited to) the following:
- When current medical staff members do not have expertise in the specialty under review
- When the only practitioners on the medical staff with expertise to review the specialty are associates, partners, or direct competitors of the practitioner under review
- When current medical staff members do not have the appropriate training or experience with new equipment or techniques
Most hospitals adopt policies that allow the MEC and governing board to use external peer review whenever deemed appropriate. For example, the medical staff may need an expert witness for a fair hearing, to evaluate a practitioner's credentials file, or to develop benchmarks for quality monitoring.
The preceding information was excerpted from The Essential Guide to Medical Staff Reappointment: Tools to Create and Maintain an Ongoing, Criteria-Based Process, Second Edition, by Anne Roberts, CPMSM, CPCS. To learn more, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Tip of the week: Don't be afraid to use external review when appropriate ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
