Ask the expert: Correction to last week's proctoring question
Medical Staff Leader Connection, February 27, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Editor's note: Last week's "Ask the expert: Who is likely to sue as a result of improper or inadequate proctoring?" stated "There is no legal or regulatory requirement to proctor every physician new to the medical staff, so it is important for hospitals to make clear that not all newly privileged clinicians will be proctored if this is not the uniform practice at the institution."
However, this tip did not take into account Joint Commission standard MS.4.30, which states that the organized medical staff is responsible for defining the circumstances that merit the evaluation of a physician's performance.
According to The Joint Commission, MS.4.30 became effective on January 1, 2007, with the exception of Element of Performance (EP) 1, which requires physicians to undergo a period of focused professional practice evaluation for all initially granted privileges. EP 1 went into effect on January 1, 2008.
The book Proctoring and Focused Professional Practice Evaluation: Practical Approaches to Verifying Physician Competence, by Robert J. Marder, MD; Mark A. Smith, MD, MBA, FACS; and Todd Sagin, MD, JD, from which last week's "Ask the Expert" was extracted, was published before EP 1 was published.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Ask the expert: Correction to last week's proctoring question ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
