Clinical privilege myth #4: There are "textbook" criteria available for delineating clinical privileges
Medical Staff Leader Connection, February 20, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Because "textbook" criteria are not often available for delineating clinical privileges, the medical staff should establish policies and procedures to ensure an effective and consistent process. As part of the privileging process, the credentials committee must collect privileging criteria from as many sources as possible. These sources include:
- Postgraduate education programs
- Specialty board requirements
- Position statements from specialty societies
- National consensus where it exists
- Threshold volumes based on published research results, including literature linking physician volume with clinical outcomes
- Journals, articles, and literature search
- CME programs
- Device manufacturers where physicians serve as leaders or consultants
- Other hospitals or ambulatory sites
- Other physicians and credentialing specialists
- White papers from the Credentialing Resource Center (CRC) that summarize data related to threshold criteria for privileges.
Tip: When evaluating conflicting professional society positions on privileging criteria, recognize that these professional societies have conflicting missions. On one hand, an association may state its mission in terms of public interest or advocacy for patients with a particular spectrum of diseases. On the other hand, the same organization also serves the interests of physicians in the specialty it represents. These two missions are not always compatible.
Tip: National societies, boards, and other organizations overseeing the fields of interventional radiology, cardiology, and vascular surgery establish minimum threshold volumes of endovascular procedures irrespective of specialty.
Combined with strong policies to deal with new technology privileges and cross-specialty privileges, the effective medical staff should be well equipped to deal with clinical privileging challenges.
Stay well and be the best you can be.
William K. Cors, MD, MMM, CMSL
Vice President Medical Staff Services
The Greeley Company
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Clinical privilege myth #4: There are "textbook" criteria available for delineating clinical privileges ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
