The Joint Commission releases potential 2009 NPSGs for review
Hospitalist Leadership Connection, January 29, 2008
The proposed 2009 National Patient Safety Goals and new Implementation Expectations have been posted for field review on The Joint Commission's Web site. Comments will be accepted through February 17 via an online feedback survey. The changes focus on the following areas:
- Goal 1, patient identification
- Goal 3, safe use of medications
- Goal 7, hospital-acquired infections focusing on methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD); catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CABSI); and surgical site infections (SSI) in acute care hospitals
- Goal 8, medication reconciliation
- Goal 13, patient involvement in their care
- Universal Protocol
To read more about the proposed NPSGs, click here.
Comments
0 comments on “The Joint Commission releases potential 2009 NPSGs for review ”
Related Products
-
Medical Staff Briefing
This monthly resource acts as a support system by providing time-saving tools, expert advice, and analyses to help you...
-
Medical Staff Leader Connection
Subscribe to our weekly e-mail newsletter for medical staff leaders that provides them encouragement, tips, tools, and...
-
OPPE, FPPE, and Proctoring Solutions for Small and Critical Access Hospitals
This expert-developed, affordable program was created with your specific needs in mind. Our Greeley experts created tailored...
-
Advanced Practice Professional Solutions for Small and Critical Access Hospitals
This expert-developed, affordable program was created with your specific needs in mind. Our Greeley experts created tailored...
-
Low-Volume Providers Solutions for Small and Critical Access Hospitals
This expert-developed, affordable program was created with your specific needs in mind. Our Greeley experts created tailored...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched