Tip of the week: Select appropriate indicators for your physician competency report
Medical Staff Leader Connection, January 23, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
In the past, hospitals created their own indicators for evaluating physician performance, but today, they can pick and choose from a plethora of national standards, including those from The Joint Commission (formerly JCAHO) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. However, not all national standards are appropriate for evaluating physician competency. In addition, they do not currently cover all of the six core competencies. This means that medical staffs still need to go through the process of selecting physician performance measures, using national standards as a guideline.
When selecting performance indicators, keep the following criteria in mind:
- Relevancy: Is it relevant to physician performance?
- Competency: Does it relate to an important expectation?
- Type: What type of indicator (i.e. review, rule, or rate) would be most appropriate?
- Data source: Should the data come from clinical documentation, incident reports. or perception surveys?
- Attribution: Can it measure individual physician performance with reasonable reliability and accuracy, or is it effective only when measuring the performance of the medical staff or specialty as a group?
- Availability: How readily can the data be accessed?
- Benefit: Is the cost of the measure worth the improvement benefit?
To learn more about selecting performance indicators, please see Measuring Physician Competency: How to Collect, Assess, and Provide Performance Data, Second Edition, by Robert Marder, MD; Mark Smith, MD; Marla Smith, MHSA; and Vicky Searcy, CPMSM.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Tip of the week: Select appropriate indicators for your physician competency report ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
