Ask the expert: How should perception data be collected?
Medical Staff Leader Connection, January 17, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Last week's "Ask the expert" column addressed when it is appropriate to use perception data to evaluate physicians' performance. But collecting data on hard-to-measure competencies, such as communication and professionalism, can be difficult.
Hospitals can collect active and/or passive perception data. Active data is collected by the parties that will be using the data and is typically structured using a series of questions or ratings, including evaluation forms, focus groups, survey forms , and survey interviews. Passive data includes feedback, such as incident reports, complaints, and compliments, that are not specifically solicited by the group that will use the data. This type of data is typically based on individual events.
Although both types of data can be useful, active methods for collecting perception data have several advantages over passive methods.
- Specific questions can be asked to evaluate specific expectations
- Data can be aggregated from larger groups to minimize the potential for personal bias of an individual
- Data can be aggregated to allow for interpretation within a comparative group rather than an absolute standard. This is particularly important because validating an absolute rating score is much more difficult than validating a comparative score
For more information on collecting perception data, please see Measuring Physician Competency by Rober Marder, MD; Mark Smith, MD; Marla Smith, MHSA; and Vicky Searcy, CPMSM.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Medical Staff Leader Connection!
Comments
0 comments on “Ask the expert: How should perception data be collected? ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
