CMS avoids confusion with provider number name change
Contemporary Long-Term Care Weekly, March 22, 2007
In order to avoid confusing the National Provider Identifier (NPI) with the Medicare/Medicaid Provider Number, CMS changed the name of the latter to the CMS Certification Number (CCN). The purpose of this name change is to distinguish between the two roles each play. Effective immediately, CMS states that the CCN will serve its same purpose as the former Medicare/Medicaid provider number and continue to be issued to certified providers and suppliers and to verify Medicare and Medicare certification on all survey and certification and resident assessment transactions, according to CMS. SNFs should continue to use their NPIs for claims, remittance advice, eligibility inquiries, prior authorization and referral, and claim status. To read CMS' release, click here http://www.hcpro.com/content/68446.cfm?s.
Related Products
-
PPS Alert for Long-Term Care
Looking for a tool to make your job easier? PPS Alert for Long-Term Care, exclusively for the RN or MDS coordinator, is your...
-
Billing Alert for Long-Term Care
It's essential to know how to correctly submit your Medicare claims in order to get the reimbursement your facility...
-
CNA Training Advisor: Lesson Plans for Busy Staff Trainers
Finally-a staff training program that really works!
-
MDS 3.0 Update
HCPro's MDS 3.0 Update is a free bi-weekly e-newsletter that provides MDS coordinators and skilled nursing facility staff...
-
The Long-Term Care Nursing Assistant's Guide to Advanced Restorative Skills
This book is written specifically for RNAs or nursing assistants to help them provide quality restorative care. Author...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched