CMS releases updated Appendix A and Section M
MDS 3.0 Update, July 25, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to MDS 3.0 Update!
On July 13, CMS released updated versions of Appendix A and Section M of the RAI User’s Manual. The only change included in both Appendix A and Section M was a new definition of a worsening in pressure ulcer status. This new definition is as follows:
“Pressure ulcer ‘worsening’ is defined as a pressure ulcer that has progressed to a deeper level of tissue damage and is therefore staged at a higher number using a numerical scale of 1-4 (using the staging assessment determinations assigned to each stage; starting at the stage 1, and increasing in severity to stage 4) on an assessment as compared to the previous assessment. For the purposes of identifying the absence of a pressure ulcer, zero pressure ulcers is used when there is no skin breakdown or evidence of damage.”
To access the RAI User’s Manual in its entirety, visit CMS’ MDS 3.0 Training Material’s webpage.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to MDS 3.0 Update!
Related Products
-
PPS Alert for Long-Term Care
Looking for a tool to make your job easier? PPS Alert for Long-Term Care, exclusively for the RN or MDS coordinator, is your...
-
The Long-Term Care Nursing Assistant's Guide to Advanced Restorative Skills
This book is written specifically for RNAs or nursing assistants to help them provide quality restorative care. Author...
-
MDS 3.0 Section M: Assessment and Coding Compliance to Protect Reimbursement
Incorrect coding of certain Section M items can have a negative impact on a facility’s reimbursement and, in today’s...
-
The Roadmap to Resident Assessment
This package provides the blueprint you need to accurately complete MDS assessments, improve CAA processes, and execute a...
-
Complete Resident Assessment Toolkit
This package provides the blueprint you need to accurately complete MDS assessments, improve CAA processes, and execute a...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched