Reminder: Be aware of timely filing requirement changes
MDS 3.0 Update, December 27, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to MDS 3.0 Update!
As the end of the year approaches, it is important that Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS) physicians, providers, or suppliers submitting claims to Medicare for payment remember the newly implemented timely filing requirement. CMS updated edit criteria related to the timely filing limit for submitting claims for Medicare FFS reimbursement. Claims with dates of service on or after January 1, 2010 received later than one calendar year beyond the date of service will be denied by Medicare.
It is important that agencies look at their claims and understand when to file in accordance with these new deadlines:
- Claims with dates of service prior to October 1, 2009 will keep their original December 31, 2010 deadline for filing
- Claims with dates of service October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 received after December 31, 2010 will be denied
- Claims with dates of service January 1, 2010 and later received more than one calendar year beyond the date of service will be denied
Two MLN Matters articles explain the timely filing requirement in-depth and further explain claims for services that require reporting of a line item date of service. Read the two MLN Matters articles that explain the timely filing changes at: http://www.cms.gov/MLNMattersArticles/downloads/MM6960.pdf and http://www.cms.gov/MLNMattersArticles/downloads/MM7080.pdf.
CMS also has a podcast dedicated to the subject, which can be found at http://www.cms.gov/CMSFeeds/02_listofpodcasts.asp
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to MDS 3.0 Update!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Searched
