Healthcare reform: Is the RUG-IV delay here to stay?
Contemporary Long-Term Care Weekly, March 25, 2010
The healthcare reform bill signed into law by President Obama on March 23 contains a provision that delays the implementation of part of Resource Utilization Group, Version Four (RUG-IV) by a year. RUG-IV was originally scheduled to be implemented alongside the MDS 3.0 in October but the amendment to the healthcare bill will not allow RUG-IV to be implemented before October 1, 2011. However, the law will still implement the RUG-IV changes to concurrent therapy and the look-back period to ensure that only services provided after SNF admission are counted toward RUG placement on October 1 of this year, along with the MDS 3.0.
“Everyone agrees that this glitch needs fixing, though there is not a provision in the reconciliation [bill] to do so, likely because only very selected legislation provisions meet the strict tests required for reconciliation legislation,” says Barbara Manard, vice president of long-term care/health strategies at the American Association of Homes & Services for the Aging (AAHSA). “Efforts are underway to devise an appropriate solution and return to the full implementation as originally planned for October 1, 2010. At AAHSA, we are advising our member facilities to continue to assume that Oct 1, 2010 is the full implementation date.”
For complete coverage of healthcare reform and its effects on long-term care, please visit MDSCentral.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Searched
