FDA helps manufacturers inform physicians about ICD recalls
Device Regulation Alert: Safety, Compliance and Reimbursement News, August 27, 2007
Device manufacturers have some new guidance about what to tell doctors when they notify them of potential health hazards of recalled implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). The FDA advised manufacturers how to prepare "Dear Doctor" letters about ICD recalls, declaring such letters the "first line of communication" with physicians about such recalls. The guidance calls the wording, format, and substance of such letters critical and provides recommendations on how to issue the letters and what information to include. The guidance does not set any new legal or regulatory requirements but merely offers recommendations.
The guidance can also help manufacturers draft such letters about other implanted devices such as pacemakers, according to the FDA. The FDA also noted the guidance may assist manufacturers in communicating non-recall information about ICDs such as updates, labeling changes, performance notes, and recommendations regarding implantation.
The guidance indicates that FDA studies revealed "best practices" on how to communicate with health care professionals about ICD problems. Such communication should:
- name the device and clearly describe the problem, then explain the deaths and adverse events and prominently identify recommended actions
- use large fonts, bold type, and formatting styles that make the letter easy to read
- be distributed by multiple methods such as e-mail, web, mail, and fax
- be distributed to health care professionals before the media alerts patients to the ICD problems
- focus on discussing the problem and recommended action not minimizing liability
- exclude promotional content
The guidance notes the Dear Doctor letters should be brief and use attachments to provide additional detailed information. The content should address, among other issues:
- the nature and severity of the problem
- how to detect whether an implanted device has already failed or may fail
- whether the device must be removed or can be monitored
- whether reprogramming or upgraded software can address the problem
- what to do with removed devices
- where to get more information
To review the guidance on the FDA's web site, click here.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Searched
