FDA focuses on flu tests
Device Regulation Alert: Safety, Compliance and Reimbursement News, June 11, 2007
To market in vitro diagnostic devices to detect Influenza A (or A/B) viruses need new labels. FDA guidance issued in May addresses the need for clear labeling and instructions on the limitations of these devices, which include CLIA-waived rapid influenza tests. The FDA noted that clarity in labeling is essential due to emerging influenza viruses.
Manufacturers whose in vitro diagnostic devices were cleared before this guidance may need to revise their labeling. The FDA recommends that such manufacturers make revisions to printed labeling by October.
The FDA guidance recommends labeling for these influenza A (or A/B) test devices include the following (which may not all apply to every device):
Other recommendations address issues such as
Finally, the guidance recommends that performance characteristics information explain the groups of patients and specimen sources used to establish the characteristics and note the type of influenza observed during the time the characteristics were established.
The guidance also addresses the premarket process for new influenza detecting devices and when manufacturers should try to demonstrate their new device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device. Device manufacturers already cleared for marketing should submit a new 510(k), the FDA recommends, before they claim the device can detect specific influenza A viruses or novel influenza viruses.
To view the guidance, click here.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Searched
