CMS proposes changes to IPPS reducing payment for replacement devices
Device Regulation Alert: Safety, Compliance and Reimbursement News, May 14, 2007
Reduced payment to hospitals for replacement devices are among CMS' recently proposed changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems (IPPS). CMS wants to share in a hospital's savings when device manufacturers give the hospital a full or significant partial credit for replacement devices.
Hospitals can often get a full or partial credit for devices needing replacement through a recall or warranty program or other basis, according to CMS. Because Medicare already paid for the initial device, CMS said it should not pay full price for the replacement if the hospital doesn't.
Thus CMS proposed adjusting the IPPS payment amount when:
CMS believes 20% is a substantial credit and significant savings to hospitals. This reduced payment policy will only apply to DRGs under IPPS for which the implantation of the device determines DRG assignment. CMS limited the DRGs to which this policy applies because it recognized that in some cases the cost of the device is a small portion of the IPPS payment and in others the device may be a significant portion of the hospital's cost for the case.
CMS also will require hospitals to report replacement devices for which they get a credit using Condition Code 49 (product replacement due to non-function during lifecycle) or Condition Code 50 (product replacement due to recall). Claims with these codes will be handled manually by the fiscal intermediary. The amount of the credit or the full cost of the device (when the hospital receives no charge or a full credit) will be subtracted from the payment. CMS proposes requiring hospitals to provide invoices that demonstrate the normal cost and the amount of any credit and seeks comment on the type of documentation that should be required and how payment should be adjusted.
Other changes that CMS proposes in the IPPS rule include use of a Medicare Severity DRG (MS-DRG) classification system to accommodate severity of an illness and changes to DRG classifications affecting procedures involving certain devices, such as intracranial stents, implantable neurostimulators, cochlear implants, and spinal disc devices.
The IPPS proposed rule was released on May 3 in the Federal Register. Public comments are due by June 12.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
