OIG: States concerned about validity of AMP data
Pharma Compliance Alert, May 9, 2007
Although CMS has been sending states monthly average manufacturer price (AMP) data since July, most states have not decided whether to use that data for Medicaid drug reimbursement. The OIG surveyed Medicaid pharmacy directors in all 50 states and the District of Columbia to find out whether they would use the data.
According to OIG, of the 47 states that completed the survey, 39 have not decided whether they will use the data. Among the other eight, four plan to use AMP data for Medicare reimbursement but haven't implemented the change, three will not use the data, and one is using AMP to help determine maximum allowable costs (MAC) for must drug products under its MAC program. Also, few states have decided whether to use retail sales price (RSP) data for Medicaid drug reimbursement.
The OIG survey found that the undecided states are unsure about the validity of the AMP data and want assurances from CMS that it's accurate.
According to the Deficit Reduction Act, CMS must set a regulation that clarifies AMP requirements by July 1. In the meantime, the OIG is calling on CMS to:
Explicitly detail AMP's definition and calculation, including the definition of retail pharmacy class of trade, when promulgating final regulations regarding the AMP
Furnish states with interim guidance and/or information regarding AMP data and provide states with the unit definition for drug products in the AMP files that are distributed
Explicitly detail RSP's definition, calculation, and method of collection when distributing RSP data to states.
Go to the OIG Web site to read the full report.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
